Howard Browning v. City of Los Angeles State of California Los Angeles Police Dept. J. Fitzgibbon P. Black

15 F.3d 1083 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Howard BROWNING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; State of California; Los Angeles Police Dept.; J. Fitzgibbon; P. Black, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55626. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 20, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Howard Browning appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to disqualify Magistrate Judge Carolyn Turchin from further proceedings in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against the City of Los Angeles and others for false arrest. Browning also appeals the denial of his motion to vacate Magistrate Judge Turchin's order imposing sanctions of $150 against him for delaying the litigation. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 Because denial of a motion to disqualify is not a final appealable order under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and the district court has not certified…