Rune Kraft v. Gainey Ranch Community Assoc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 202221-15653California387 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 28 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RUNE KRAFT, No. 21-15653
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05697-JJT
v.
MEMORANDUM*
GAINEY RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION; KAREN EPSTEIN; JIM
FUNK; CHARLENE A. CRUZ; MAUREEN
MARTHA CONNOLLY; MARION
ELIZABETH MULCAHY; PAIGE
ELIZABETH MARKS; LAUREN VIE;
DOES, 1-10, Inclusive,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Rune Kraft appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his action
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”).