Rune Kraft v. Gainey Ranch Community Assoc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 202221-15653California387 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUNE KRAFT, No. 21-15653

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05697-JJT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GAINEY RANCH COMMUNITY

ASSOCIATION; KAREN EPSTEIN; JIM

FUNK; CHARLENE A. CRUZ; MAUREEN

MARTHA CONNOLLY; MARION

ELIZABETH MULCAHY; PAIGE

ELIZABETH MARKS; LAUREN VIE;

DOES, 1-10, Inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Rune Kraft appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his action

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.