Bobbie L. Celestine v. City of San Jose Murray Levison Judy Jones T. Larussa William Pope Cleon Eccles Joan Taylor

15 F.3d 1083 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Bobbie L. CELESTINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE; Murray Levison; Judy Jones; T. Larussa; William Pope; Cleon Eccles; Joan Taylor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15391. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 4, 1994. * Decided Jan. 12, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Bobbie L. Celestine appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint against the City of San Jose and six City employees. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Love v. United States, 915 F.2d 1242, 1245 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 The alleged facts are as follows. Sometime before July 1989, Celestine's landlord divided his apartment in half by building a wall without obtaining a permit. In July 1989, Celestine reported the illegal division to the City. In August 1989, defendant Pope inspected the…