Keicy Chung v. Vistana Vacation Ownership

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 202221-15936California389 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEICY CHUNG, No. 21-15936

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00469-LEK-RT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

VISTANA VACATION OWNERSHIP,

INC.; STARWOOD HOTELS AND

RESORTS WORLDWIDE, LLC, FKA

Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Keicy Chung appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his diversity action alleging state law claims related to his purchase of a timeshare

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). property in Hawaii. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for

an abuse of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.