Jeane Gregory v. Gust Rosenfeld Plc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 202221-16853California300 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEANE GREGORY, No. 21-16853

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00877-GMS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GUST ROSENFELD PLC; MARICOPA

COUNTY ATTORNEY; SUPERIOR

COURT OF ARIZONA, Maricopa County;

ARIZONA STATE BAR,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Jeane Gregory appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

for failure to comply with a court order her diversity action alleging claims arising

out of a probate proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review for an abuse of discretion.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.