Jeane Gregory v. Gust Rosenfeld Plc
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 202221-16853California300 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 28 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JEANE GREGORY, No. 21-16853
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00877-GMS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
GUST ROSENFELD PLC; MARICOPA
COUNTY ATTORNEY; SUPERIOR
COURT OF ARIZONA, Maricopa County;
ARIZONA STATE BAR,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Jeane Gregory appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
for failure to comply with a court order her diversity action alleging claims arising
out of a probate proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review for an abuse of discretion.…