George Austin v. Tesla, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 28 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, No. 21-15151
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00800-EMC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TESLA, INC.; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
George Jarvis Austin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging federal and state law violations stemming from his
employment termination. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Hebbe
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010). We…