Donald Lilly v. County of Humboldt

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 202221-16114California334 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONALD LILLY, No. 21-16114

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:19-cv-07941-NC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT; SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Nathanael M. Cousins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted June 15, 2022***

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

The responses to the October 5, 2021 order demonstrate that this appeal

involves non-frivolous issues. The order to show cause is therefore discharged,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and Lilly’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 10) is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.