Donald Lilly v. County of Humboldt
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 202221-16114California334 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 28 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DONALD LILLY, No. 21-16114
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:19-cv-07941-NC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT; SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Nathanael M. Cousins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted June 15, 2022***
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
The responses to the October 5, 2021 order demonstrate that this appeal
involves non-frivolous issues. The order to show cause is therefore discharged,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and Lilly’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 10) is…