Rogelio Cristobal-Quilisadio v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

15 F.3d 1084 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rogelio CRISTOBAL-QUILISADIO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70481. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 20, 1993. 1 Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Rogelio Cristobal-Quilisadio, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal's ("BIA") order upholding the immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of Cristobal-Quilisadio's request for voluntary departure. Cristobal-Quilisadio argues that he was denied due process because he was not provided an interpreter at his deportation hearing. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). We review de novo a claim that an immigration proceeding violated due process. Barraza Rivera v. INS, 913 F.2d 1443, 1448 (9th Cir.1990). We deny the petition. 4 It is well established that aliens are entitled to…