Shekarchi

Shekarchi v. Fischbach CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2022B311989California3,616 words

Opinion

Opinion

Harutunian, J.

Filed 6/28/22 Shekarchi v. Fischbach CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

EIMAN SHEKARCHI et al., B311989

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20SMCV00636) v.

JOSEPH S. FISCHBACH et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Mark H. Epstein, Judge. Affirmed. Nemecek & Cole, Mark Schaeffer and Marshall R. Cole, for Defendants and Appellants. Law Firm of Harold Greenberg, Harold Greenberg and Jenifer Anisman for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

_________________________________ Eiman Shekarchi and April Heidarian (respondents) signed a retainer agreement with the law firm of Fischbach & Fischbach. Respondents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.