Baussan

Baussan v. Imara CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2022A162088California4,004 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 6/28/22 Baussan v. Imara CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

EDOUARD BAUSSAN,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A162088

v. NIA IMARA et al., (City and County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. CGC- Defendants and Appellants. 20-585692)

Plaintiff Edouard Baussan filed the underlying defamation complaint against defendants Nia Imara, Pierre Labossiere, Leslie Mullin, and Robert Roth in connection with an online article that defendants published. The trial court denied defendants’ special motion to strike the complaint under California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) law. (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16.)1 In denying the motion, the trial court found that Baussan had shown a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.