Deparrie v. City of Portland

15 F.3d 1084 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul C. dEPARRIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon; Fred Meyer; Right to Privacy Political Action Committee, et al.; No On Hate Political Action Committee, et al.; Radical Women; Charles Hinkle, individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the court; Tom Potter, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Portland Police; Katie Potter, individually and in her official capacity as a Portland Police Officer, et al.; John Baker; John Does, 1-50 and Jane Does, 1-50, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36769. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 4, 1994. * Decided Jan. 11, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul C. deParrie appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1985 action against the City of Portland, the Portland Chief of Police, and various groups…