Euram Realty, Inc. v. Arland Drew Dunn Carolyn Sue Dunn, and William F. Root

15 F.3d 1084 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. EURAM REALTY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arland Drew DUNN; Carolyn Sue Dunn, Defendants-Appellants and William F. Root, Defendant. No. 93-55833. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 10, 1993. * Decided Dec. 23, 1993. Before: CHOY, TANG, and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This appeal arises out of a contract action by Euram Realty, Inc. ("Euram Realty") against appellants' clients Arland Drew Dunn, Carolyn Sue Dunn, and William F. Root (collectively, "Dunns"). Appellants Mahoney, Coppenrath & Jaffe and Walter G. Coppenrath, Jr. (collectively, "Coppenrath"), appeal the district court's $1,000 sanction ordered pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P. The district court imposed the sanction against Coppenrath for his failure to present new facts, law, or other grounds authorizing reconsideration of a previous court order. Coppenrath contends that the district court abused its…