Alvaro Echavarria-Olarte v. Janet Reno , Attorney General for the United States of America

Good Law
15 F.3d 1084·1993 WL 534318
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 199393-15752California834 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1084 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alvaro ECHAVARRIA-OLARTE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Janet RENO ** , Attorney General for the United States of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-15752. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 22, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Federal prisoner Alvaro Echavarria-Olarte appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and six counts of transportation in aid of racketeering. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 , and we affirm. 3 The denial of a motion under Sec. 2255 is reviewed de novo. Walker v. United States, 816 F.2d 1313, 1316 (9th Cir.1987). The sufficiency of an indictment also is reviewed de novo. United States v. Yarbrough, 852 F.2d 1522, 1530 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 866 (1988). 4 An…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.