No. 92-55894

Good Law
15 F.3d 1084
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 19941084California1,238 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1084 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark CONDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Randy ERLANDSON; Western Nurses; County of Riverside; Brian Tonseth; David Russell; Jim Hearn; Rick Sayre; Riverside Community Hospital; and Does 1 through 60, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55894. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. Decided Jan. 12, 1994. Before: HUG, SCHROEDER, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Mark Condon, a Riverside County Deputy Sheriff, seeks damages from his supervisors under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . He alleges violations of his due process and First Amendment rights. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of the appellees on all of Condon's claims. 3 Condon's due process claim stems from his two-day suspension following an episode in which he ran a red light without using his motorcycle siren in violation of Department regulations. His principal contention is that he was entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.