Callanan

Callanan v. Grizzly Designs CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 29, 2022C094008California4,719 words

Opinion

Opinion

Earl, J.

Filed 6/29/22 Callanan v. Grizzly Designs CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Trinity) ----

CONNOR CALLANAN, C094008

Cross-complainant and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 20CV057)

v.

GRIZZLY DESIGNS, LLC, et al.,

Cross-defendants and Respondents.

At issue in this appeal is whether a cross-complaint filed by Connor Callanan against Charles Menken, Steven Menken, and Grizzly Designs, LLC, dba Brotherly Love (collectively “the Menkens”) is a SLAPP suit1 subject to a special motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (also known as the anti-SLAPP statute).2 The Menkens contend Callanan’s cross-complaint is a SLAPP suit because it was filed in

1 SLAPP stands for strategic litigation against public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.