Lee Roy Cook Jo Ann Cook William McCurdy v. Boise Cascade Corporation

Good Law
15 F.3d 1084·1994 WL 6655·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6743
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 199492-35516California638 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1084 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lee Roy COOK; Jo Ann Cook; William McCurdy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-35516. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 5, 1994. * Decided Jan. 10, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, CANBY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The district court granted summary judgment to Boise Cascade. The Cooks and McCurdy appeal. We affirm. 3 We review de novo a grant of summary judgment. Jones v. Union Pacific R.R., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1992). We review the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party to determine whether any genuine issues of material fact exist. F.D.I.C. v. O'Melveny & Meyers, 969 F.2d 744 , 747 (9th Cir.1992), cert. granted, 62 U.S.L.W. 3375 (U.S. Nov. 29, 1993) (No. 93-489). 4 The moving party has the initial burden of showing the absence of any genuine issue of material fact. T.W. Elec. Serv. v. Pacific…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.