Craig P. Hoefler v. Caesars Tahoe, Iatse Union Local No. 363

15 F.3d 1085 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Craig P. HOEFLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caesars TAHOE, Iatse Union Local No. 363, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16306. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 13, 1993. * Decided Jan. 31, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Martin Crowley, counsel to Craig Hoefler, appeals the imposition of a sanction against him for violating Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellee argues that we lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal because Crowley's notice of appeal does not comply with Rule 3(c) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. We conclude jurisdiction exists, and we reverse the Rule 11 sanction. 3 * Crowley's client, Craig Hoefler, sought union representation after he was terminated on January 1, 1990 from his position as a sound technician with Caesars Tahoe resort ("Caesars"). The I.A.T.S.E., Local 363 ("Union"), refused to…