Jose Antonio Galvez, Jr. v. Carl Nink

Good Law
15 F.3d 1085·1994 WL 18975·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6763
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 21, 199492-16043California415 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1085 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose Antonio GALVEZ, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl NINK, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-16043. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 18, 1994. * Decided Jan. 21, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Antonio Galvez, Jr., an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 A notice of appeal from a district court's judgment denying a habeas petition must be filed within thirty days of the date of judgment. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1); Malone v. Avenenti, 850 F.2d 569, 571 (9th Cir.1988). The appellant may obtain an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, upon a showing of good cause or excusable neglect. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5); Malone, 850 F.2d at 571 . If the appellant seeks an extension of time after the initial thirty-day…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.