United States v. Paul Weldon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202221-15311California497 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

JUN 29 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-15311

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-01318-AWI-SKO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAUL D. WELDON,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE

TAX BOARD; COUNTY OF FRESNO;

CITY OF FRESNO,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Paul D. Weldon appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for the United States in its action seeking to reduce federal tax assessments to

judgment, and foreclose on tax liens. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo. Hughes v. United States, 953…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.