Setondji Nahum v. Lonnie Spear

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202221-35225California443 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SETONDJI VIRGILE NAHUM, No. 21-35225

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01151-DWC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LONNIE SPEAR; AMBER HODGE;

HOME DEPOT USA, INC.; GEORGE M.

DEREZES; JAMES P. SCOTT; CITY OF

SEATTLE,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington David W. Christel, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted June 15, 2022***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Setondji Virgile Nahum appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging various federal and state law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.