Ramon Silva v. Cameron Walker

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202221-35398California312 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAMON SAUL SILVA, No. 21-35398

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01294-RAJ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CAMERON WALKER, Sergeant; JASON EDMOND, Officer; DANIEL MOLINA, Officer; BARRETT HORN,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Ramon Saul Silva appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force and inadequate medical

care after he was pepper sprayed during his pretrial detention. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Jones v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.