Mikeal Stine v. K. Garcia

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202222-15120California336 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIKEAL GLENN STINE, No. 22-15120

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-00187-DCB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

K. GARCIA, Trust Fund Supervisor,

USP/Tucson, Arizona,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

B. VON BLANKENSEE; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Mikeal Glenn Stine appeals pro se from the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). interlocutory order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his action

under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403

U.S. 388 (1971), alleging a First Amendment violation. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.