Jinxiang Bao v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202218-71824California831 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JINXIANG BAO, No. 18-71824

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-004-953

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 16, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, MILLER, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Jinxiang Bao, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the denial of her applications for

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

Torture. Bao alleges that she was persecuted by the Chinese government for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). practicing Tibetan Buddhism. She claims that on at least one occasion in 2013,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.