Grant Kim v. Superior Court of California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202221-55603California273 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GRANT S. KIM, No. 21-55603

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-00644-JGB-SP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, Executive Office,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Grant S. Kim appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his

action against the Superior Court of California seeking to overturn an unfavorable

judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.