Brenda Johnson v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202221-35761California376 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRENDA M. JOHNSON, No. 21-35761
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-05242-MJP
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Brenda M. Johnson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing her action for failure to comply with the pleading requirements of
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failure to state a claim. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Watison v. Carter, 668
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal…