Brenda Johnson v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202221-35761California376 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRENDA M. JOHNSON, No. 21-35761

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-05242-MJP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Brenda M. Johnson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action for failure to comply with the pleading requirements of

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failure to state a claim. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Watison v. Carter, 668

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.