Barbara Tangwall v. William Satterberg, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202221-35049California376 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BARBARA TANGWALL; DONNA No. 21-35049

UPHUES,

D.C. No. 4:20-cv-00040-SLG Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

WILLIAM R. SATTERBERG, Jr., et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Barbara Tangwall and Donna Uphues appeal pro se from the district court’s

judgment in their action alleging federal and state law claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We may affirm on any basis supported by the

record. Thompson v. Paul, 547 F.3d 1055, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Denial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.