Barbara Tangwall v. William Satterberg, Jr.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BARBARA TANGWALL; DONNA No. 21-35049
UPHUES,
D.C. No. 4:20-cv-00040-SLG Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. MEMORANDUM*
WILLIAM R. SATTERBERG, Jr., et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Barbara Tangwall and Donna Uphues appeal pro se from the district court’s
judgment in their action alleging federal and state law claims. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We may affirm on any basis supported by the
record. Thompson v. Paul, 547 F.3d 1055, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Denial…