Audrey Kimner v. Lucy Koh

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202221-16932California310 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AUDREY L. KIMNER, No. 21-16932

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-07107-EJD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LUCY H. KOH; NATHANAEL M.

COUSINS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Audrey L. Kimner appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law violations

stemming from defendants’ dismissal of her lawsuit brought in 2019. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Watison v. Carter,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.