Audrey Kimner v. Lucy Koh
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202221-16932California310 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AUDREY L. KIMNER, No. 21-16932
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-07107-EJD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LUCY H. KOH; NATHANAEL M.
COUSINS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Audrey L. Kimner appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law violations
stemming from defendants’ dismissal of her lawsuit brought in 2019. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Watison v. Carter,…