Anibal Silva v. Rod Danielson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202221-55873California590 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

JUN 29 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: ANIBAL SILVA, No. 21-55873

Debtor, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-00265-JWH ______________________________

ANIBAL SILVA, MEMORANDUM*

Appellant,

v.

ROD DANIELSON; MIDLAND

MORTGAGE; MIDFIRST BANK,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John W. Holcomb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Chapter 13 debtor Anibal Silva appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing Silva’s bankruptcy

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo a

district court’s decision on appeal from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.