Anibal Silva v. Rod Danielson
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 202221-55873California590 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
JUN 29 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: ANIBAL SILVA, No. 21-55873
Debtor, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-00265-JWH ______________________________
ANIBAL SILVA, MEMORANDUM*
Appellant,
v.
ROD DANIELSON; MIDLAND
MORTGAGE; MIDFIRST BANK,
Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John W. Holcomb, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Chapter 13 debtor Anibal Silva appeals pro se from the district court’s
judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing Silva’s bankruptcy
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo a
district court’s decision on appeal from a…