Garry T. Harrell v. Eddie Ylst

15 F.3d 1085 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Garry T. HARRELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, et al., Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-16836. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 13, 1993. * Decided Jan. 11, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GARTH ** and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Harrell, a convicted first-degree murderer, appeals the dismissal by the district court of his petition for habeas corpus relief. Harrell asserts that his due process rights were violated when the California Parole Board, sitting en banc, nullified a proposed parole date that had been tentatively granted by a 2-1 vote of a parole hearing panel. We affirm, though on slightly different grounds than those relied upon by the district court. I. 2 The Due Process Clause provides that a person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. Only a limited range of interests, however, fall within this provision. That…