Harris v. Resolution Trust Corp.

15 F.3d 1085 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard R. HARRIS, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Receiver of Arrowhead Pacific Savings Bank; Beverly Collins; Mary McIntire; Arrowhead Pacific, (RTC), Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55245. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 4, 1994. * Decided Jan. 11, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard R. Harris appeals pro se the district court's judgment, following a bench trial, in favor of defendants. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 * Background 4 In December 1987, Harris endorsed and deposited seven checks totaling $79,477.99 in his account at the Arrowhead Savings Bank ("Arrowhead"). The checks were third-party checks that had purportedly been endorsed by the various third parties and that had somehow made their way into Harris's possession. Arrowhead gave Harris…