Darlene Jones Rodney Jones v. Todd Rhea Kings County

Good Law
15 F.3d 1086·1994 WL 2783·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6779
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 5, 199492-16253California877 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1086 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darlene JONES; Rodney Jones, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Todd RHEA; Kings County, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16253. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 16, 1993. Decided Jan. 5, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GARTH * and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Jones appeals from the district court's summary judgment in favor of Rhea and the City of Corcoran in her 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. She alleges Rhea made false statements in his affidavit supporting a search warrant. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1331 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 2 We review a summary judgment independently. Judie v. Hamilton, 872 F.2d 919, 920 (9th Cir.1989). "Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, we must determine whether there are any genuine issues of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.