Martin Allen Johnson v. State of Oregon

15 F.3d 1086 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Martin Allen JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON; et. al, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-35247. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 18, 1994. * Decided Jan. 21, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Former federal prisoner Martin Allen Johnson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition and the denial of his motion for reconsideration. Johnson alleges that the State of Oregon, Multnomah County, and the Portland Police Bureau conducted an unlawful search of his residence and subsequently instituted an unlawful state forfeiture proceeding. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's decision on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Admas v. Peterson, 968 F.2d 835, 843 (9th Cir.1992) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1818…