Nolan Edward Klein v. Steven P. Elliott Timothy G. Randolph City of Sparks Mark McCartt

Good Law
15 F.3d 1086·1994 WL 5561·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6774
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 199493-16343California256 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1086 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nolan Edward KLEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven P. ELLIOTT; Timothy G. Randolph; City of Sparks; Mark McCartt, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16343. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 6, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nolan Edward Klein, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing Klein's civil rights complaint with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d). The district court dismissed Klein's complaint sua sponte prior to service of process after requiring Klein to pay a partial filing fee. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We reverse. 3 "[A] district court may not sua sponte dismiss an action as frivolous under section 1915(d) after the plaintiff has paid a partial filing fee." Butler v. Leen, 4 F.3d 772, 773 (9th Cir.1993) (per curiam). Thus,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.