Chelsea Hamilton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Good Law
39 F.4th 575
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 202219-56161California7,447 words

Opinion

Opinion

Berzon, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHELSEA HAMILTON; ALYSSA No. 19-56161 HERNANDEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly D.C. Nos. situated, 5:17-cv-01415- Plaintiffs-Appellants, AB-KK 5:17-cv-01485- v. AB-KK

WAL-MART STORES, INC., a corporation; WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a corporation; DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. HAMILTON V. WAL-MART STORES

CHELSEA HAMILTON; ALYSSA No. 20-55223 HERNANDEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly D.C. Nos. situated, 5:17-cv-01415- Plaintiffs-Appellees, AB-KK 5:17-cv-01485- v. AB-KK

WAL-MART STORES, INC., a corporation; WAL-MART OPINION ASSOCIATES, INC., a corporation, Defendants-Appellants,

and

DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 14, 2021 Pasadena,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.