Marriage of Quintana CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 2022C092708California561 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

The parties were married in December 1991. A judgment dissolving their marriage was entered in September 2016. Included in that judgment was a marital settlement agreement, in which respondent agreed to “take assignment of his son’s

1 Student Loan” debt in the approximate amount of $30,000. The parties agreed to a mutual waiver of spousal support, and respondent agreed to pay to appellant an “equalizing payment” totaling $1,850. In March 2019, following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court ruled that respondent was “solely responsible for the student loans in the amount of $34,604.19 . . . [and] for expenses incurred to repair damage and for maintenance of the home in the amount of $2,293.05.” The court also ruled that appellant was “entitled to reimbursement for payment of the mortgage arrears in the amount of $3,441.00 and $797.05 for arrears on the second mortgage.” The court awarded appellant attorney’s fees totaling $5,000. The court ordered respondent pay to appellant $150 each month “for repayment of the student loans,” and $150 each month toward her attorney fees. The payments were to begin on April 1, 2019. On August 5, 2019, the trial court issued an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.