Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department Darryl Gates, Police Chief City of Los Angeles Tom Bradley Sid Mills

15 F.3d 1086 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Parviz KARIM-PANAHI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT; Darryl Gates, Police Chief; City of Los Angeles; Tom Bradley; Sid Mills, et al. Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55131. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 6, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Parviz Karim-Panahi appeals pro se the district court's entry of judgment in favor of defendants on count three of Karim-Panahi's civil rights action and dismissal of Karim-Panahi's remaining claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 Pursuant to this court's order dated May 15, 1992, our review is limited to the following district court orders: (1) the January 3, 1992 order entering judgment on count three in favor of defendants; (2) the January 16, 1992 order rescheduling the hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss; (3) the…