Larry Joe Martin v. Lori Adkins Edie Freeman Roger Bourne George Parham August Cahill

15 F.3d 1087 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Larry Joe MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lori ADKINS; Edie Freeman; Roger Bourne; George Parham; August Cahill; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35518. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 10, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Idaho state prisoner Larry Joe Martin appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that his due process and equal protection rights were violated based on a conspiracy which resulted in his wrongful conviction for second degree burglary and attempted rape. Martin contends that the alleged victim, Lori Adkins; testifying witness, Edie Freeman; the prosecuting attorney, Roger Bourne; public defenders assigned to represent Martin, George Parham and August Cahill; and others conspired to convict him for crimes he did not commit. We review the…