Frederick Leonard v. G. Casillas
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 202221-16225California452 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 30 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FREDERICK E. LEONARD, No. 21-16225
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-02004-WBS-CKD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
G. CASILLAS; A. SHAHID; P. FOSTER;
SPECIAL APPEARANCE,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Frederick E. Leonard appeals pro se from the
district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process and retaliation claims. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s ruling
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…