Frederick Leonard v. G. Casillas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 202221-16225California452 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 30 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDERICK E. LEONARD, No. 21-16225

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-02004-WBS-CKD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

G. CASILLAS; A. SHAHID; P. FOSTER;

SPECIAL APPEARANCE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Frederick E. Leonard appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process and retaliation claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s ruling

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.