Jacob Martin v. United States Parole Commission
Opinion
Opinion
15 F.3d 1087 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jacob MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-15980. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 4, 1994. * Decided Jan. 12, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jacob Martin, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se (1) the district court's order granting in part and denying in part his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 habeas corpus petition and (2) the district court's order denying his subsequent reconsideration motion. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 , and we affirm. 3 On January 4, 1993, the district court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Martin's habeas petition challenging the United States Parole Commission's March 11, 1991 decision. The Commission had rescinded Martin's May 22, 1989 parole date and ordered him to serve an additional term of imprisonment. The district…