Marriage of Corvese and Pytel CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 2022E074266California2,368 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

Tamara Corvese and Anthony Pytel were married for 19 years and raised two

children together—a son and a daughter, who are now adults. During the marriage,

Tamara took care of the children and managed the household while Anthony, the sole

income-earner, managed all the financial decisions for the family.

Among the many issues the couple disputed during their divorce was the status of

the family residence, which occupies two lots on Lingo Lane in Palm Desert (one lot

contains the residence; the other a swimming pool). Tamara listed the residence as

community property in her divorce petition; Anthony listed it as his separate property in

his response.

The Lingo Lane residence has been in Anthony’s family since the late 1960s,

when his father purchased it after returning home from the Vietnam War. Tamara and

Anthony were married in 1997. The following year, Anthony’s parents helped the couple

2 purchase their first home by obtaining a veteran’s loan. For the approximately five years

the couple lived in their first home, they paid the mortgage payments on the loan, and

Anthony owned the property with his parents as tenants in common.

On November 25, 2002,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.