Elvia Luisa MacHado v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

15 F.3d 1087 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elvia Luisa MACHADO-HERRERA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70682. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 22, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Elvia Luisa Machado-Herrera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of her request for suspension of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition. 3 Machado-Herrera contends that the BIA erred by finding her ineligible for suspension of deportation because even though she met the residency and moral character requirements, she did not establish that deportation would cause extreme hardship to her or her daughter. This contention lacks merit. 4 We review under a substantial-evidence…