Pratt v. Snohomish County

Good Law
15 F.3d 1088
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 199493-35658California1,341 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1088 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robin Marie PRATT, The Estate of Robin Marie Pratt, by and through Larry Dean Pratt, Personal Representative of the Estate; Larry Dean Pratt, husband of Robin Marie Pratt, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY; et al., Defendants, and Lawrence Kalsbeek, in his capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Lynnwnood and as an individual; Paul W. Wunders, in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Lynnwood and as an individual; Karen Manser, in her capacity as a police officer for the City of Lynnwood and as an individual, Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-35658. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 16, 1994. Decided Jan. 14, 1993. 1 Before: BROWNING, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * I. JURISDICTION 3 This court has jurisdiction to hear defendants' appeal. An order denying a motion for summary judgment on a claim of qualified immunity is immediately…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.