Teodolfo Domasig Rabuy v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Opinion
Opinion
15 F.3d 1088 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Teodolfo Domasig RABUY, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70618. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 10, 1994. * Decided Jan. 31, 1994. 1 Before: ALDISERT, *** WIGGINS, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM *** FACTS 3 Petitioner, a lawful permanent resident, was charged in California state court with possession of methamphetamine. On his public defender's advice, petitioner pleaded guilty. Neither the public defender nor the state trial court advised petitioner that a conviction might subject him to deportation. Petitioner claims to have only limited comprehension of English and that he would not have pleaded guilty had he known this consequence. 4 After serving his sentence, petitioner was served with an order to show cause why he should not be deported for being convicted of violating a law relating to a controlled substance, under section…