Rhodora Quirante-Mesina v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

15 F.3d 1088 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rhodora QUIRANTE-MESINA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70447. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 7, 1994. * Decided Jan. 12, 1994. 1 Before: GOODWIN, HALL, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Rhodora Quirante-Mesina, a native of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of her appeal of the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") decision denying her application for voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1105(a) and we deny the petition for review. I. 4 Quirante argues that the BIA erred in denying her application for voluntary departure because it improperly relied on unsupported factors such as her prior misrepresentations to immigration officials and the IJ's finding that she lacked credibility. We review discretionary denials of voluntary departure…