Michael M. Ramadanovic v. Daniel Vasquez

15 F.3d 1088 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael M. RAMADANOVIC, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel VASQUEZ, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-16974. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 22, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael M. Ramadanovic, a Florida state prisoner subject to a detainer lodged by the State of California, 1 appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. Ramadanovic was convicted by the California Superior Court for Merced County of first degree murder with special circumstances on July 27, 1981. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo, Hendricks v. Zenon, 993 F.2d 664, 668 (9th Cir.1993), and affirm. 3 A state prisoner must exhaust all available state court remedies before a federal court may consider the merits of his habeas corpus petition.…