Atm Magfoor Rahman Sarkar v. Merrick Garland
39 F.4th 611
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 202217-72212California5,564 words
Opinion
Opinion
FORREST, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ATM MAGFOOR RAHMAN SARKAR; No. 17-72212
HASNA HENA RAHMAN; SAIQA
RAHMAN; SAHRIAR RAHMAN, Agency Nos. Petitioners, A070-952-103
A070-952-104
v. A070-952-105
A070-952-107
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. OPINION
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted March 10, 2022 Pasadena, California
Filed July 1, 2022
Before: Sandra S. Ikuta, Kenneth K. Lee, and Danielle J. Forrest, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Forrest SUMMARY *
Immigration
The panel denied the parties’ motion for judicial administrative closure of the case and denied Atm Magfoor Rahman Sarkar, his wife, and their children’s petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of their third motion to reopen.
Although this case had been pending for nearly five years, shortly before oral argument both Sarkar and the Government moved to administratively close the case because the Government had deemed Sarkar a low enforcement priority. The panel denied the parties’…