Ray Nehdar v. Allstate Insurance Company

Good Law
15 F.3d 1088·1993 WL 540284·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37479
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 30, 199392-55523California2,238 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1088 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ray NEHDAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-55523. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 30, 1993. Decided Dec. 30, 1993. Before: TANG, CANBY and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Ray Nehdar appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Allstate Insurance Company. The district court determined that Nehdar had not complied with the statutory prerequisites to maintain an action against an insurer for underinsured motorist coverage pursuant to section 11580.2(i) of the California Insurance Code. We affirm. 3 Nehdar suffered injuries in an automobile accident on February 22, 1990. The other motorist involved in the accident carried $15,000 of liability insurance under a policy issued by Farmers Insurance. Nehdar is insured by Allstate. His policy includes uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage as required by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.