Ana Salazar Arroyo De Rucal v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 202220-71271California1,079 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 1 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANA PAOLA SALAZAR ARROYO DE No. 20-71271

RUCAL; ZURY SAMIRA RUCAL

SALAZAR, Agency Nos. A208-307-062

A208-307-063

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted June 10, 2022 Seattle, Washington

Before: IKUTA and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON,** District Judge.

Ana Paola Salazar Arroyo De Rucal petitions for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an immigration judge’s decision finding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. her to be not credible and denying her applications—and the rider application of

her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.