Restaurant Employees, Bartenders & Hotel Service Employees Health & Welfare Pension Trust v. Ferryman

15 F.3d 1088 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES, BARTENDERS & HOTEL SERVICE EMPLOYEES HEALTH & WELFARE PENSION TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H.E. FERRYMAN, a/k/a Ferryman Enterprises, and Quality Hotel Tacoma Dome, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-36642. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1994. Decided Feb. 7, 1994. Before: CANBY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges and SHUBB, District Judge. * MEMORANDUM ** H.E. Ferryman appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for the Restaurant Employees, Bartenders & Hotel Service Employees Health & Welfare & Pension Trust Fund (the Fund), which held that under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA), Ferryman must make payments into the Fund for new employees who are not yet eligible to receive health benefits from the Fund. We affirm. DISCUSSION We review de novo a district court's interpretation of a collective…