Jon Robert Perroton v. W. Seifert, Warden

Good Law
15 F.3d 1088·1994 WL 5531·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6293
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 199491-56409California2,097 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1088 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jon Robert PERROTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W. SEIFERT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-56409. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 6, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jon Robert Perroton, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 . 1 Perroton contends (1) the United States Parole Commission abused its discretion by extending his parole release date beyond the applicable parole guidelines range, (2) the Sentencing Guidelines should be applied on his behalf, and (3) he has a liberty interest requiring that he be released on his minimum parole eligibility date. We affirm because we find no merit to any of these claims. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 3 Perroton was indicted in the Northern District of California on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.